Difference between revisions of "FASB.944"

From BattleActs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Review of Reinsurance Accounting Concepts)
(Review of Reinsurance Accounting Concepts)
Line 123: Line 123:
 
* '''Retroactive''' reinsures past events   
 
* '''Retroactive''' reinsures past events   
 
* Some treaties contain '''both''' types   
 
* Some treaties contain '''both''' types   
(Useful context, lightly tested.)
 
 
|}
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
 
! style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''#'''
 
! '''Topic'''
 
! '''What Matters for Exam 6-US'''
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''1'''
 
| '''Two Conditions for Reinsurance Accounting'''
 
| * '''Significant insurance risk''' must be transferred
 
 
'''Significant loss''' to reinsurer must be reasonably possible
 
(ASC 944-20-15-41)
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''2'''
 
| '''Definition of Significant Insurance Risk'''
 
| Insurance risk must include:
 
 
'''Uncertainty in amount''' of losses
 
 
'''Uncertainty in timing''' of losses
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''3'''
 
| '''Mechanics of the Significant-Loss Test'''
 
| GAAP rules underlying ERD/10-10 logic:
 
 
PV of '''all''' cash flows
 
 
'''One consistent''' discount rate
 
 
Include all cash flows between parties
 
 
Use '''gross premiums''' (no expense netting)
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''4'''
 
| '''Reasonably Possible Scenario Requirement'''
 
| A scenario is considered valid only if:
 
 
'''The entire set of assumptions''' can reasonably occur together
 
(Prevents cherry-picking assumptions.)
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''5'''
 
| '''"Substantially All" Exception'''
 
| Risk transfer may still exist if significant loss is not possible, provided:
 
 
Reinsurer assumes '''substantially all''' risk
 
 
Cedant retains '''no more than trivial''' risk
 
 
Reinsurer's economics ≈ '''direct writer'''
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''6'''
 
| '''Deposit Accounting Trigger'''
 
| If no indemnification of insurance risk exists:
 
 
Ceded premium treated as a '''deposit'''
 
 
No reserve credit / no reinsurance accounting
 
 
|-
 
| style="width:50px; text-align:center;" | '''7'''
 
| '''Prospective vs. Retroactive Reinsurance'''
 
| Conceptual distinctions:
 
 
'''Prospective''' reinsures future events
 
 
'''Retroactive''' reinsures past events
 
 
Some treaties contain '''both''' types
 
 
(Useful context, lightly tested.)
 
(Useful context, lightly tested.)
  

Revision as of 14:32, 28 November 2025

Reading: Accounting Standards Codification 944, “Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts,” 2011, Section 15, Scope and Scope Exceptions, paragraphs:

  • 1-2
  • 5-7
  • 34-35
  • 41-44
  • 49-54

Candidates are not responsible for material relating to long-duration contracts and/or life insurance.

Author: Financial Accounting Standards Board

Forum    (Or click here for Legacy Forum – no longer monitored)

BA Quick-Summary: FASB 944 - Financial Guarantee Contracts

This paper provides guidance from FASB regarding Financial Guarantee insurance contracts.

Study Tips

Virtually all of the content in this reading is covered in other reinsurance readings. The only thing you might want to learn is the definition of financial guarantee insurance.

BattleTable

  • this reading has not been tested on any exam from the year 2012 to Fall 2019 when the exams stopped being published.
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
no prior questions

Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.

In Plain English!

Definition of Financial Guarantee

A financial guarantee is a non-cancellable indemnity bond backed by an insurer to guarantee investors that principal and interest payments will be made. Or in simpler terms:

  • it covers a lender from the liability resulting from the borrower defaulting on a loan

The reading draws a distinction between short and long-duration contracts. A short-duration contract is characterized by:

  • providing insurance protection for a fixed period of short duration (pretty darn obvious!)
  • enabling insurer to cancel the contract or adjust the provision at the end of the contract period

Financial reporting of a reinsurance contract depends on whether the contract is:

  • short or long-duration
  • prospective or retrospective

Review of Reinsurance Accounting Concepts

# Topic What Matters for Exam 6-US
1 Two Conditions for Reinsurance Accounting
  • Significant insurance risk must be transferred
  • Significant loss to reinsurer must be reasonably possible

(ASC 944-20-15-41)

2 Definition of Significant Insurance Risk Insurance risk must include:
  • Uncertainty in amount of losses
  • Uncertainty in timing of losses
3 Mechanics of the Significant-Loss Test GAAP rules underlying ERD/10-10 logic:
  • PV of all cash flows
  • One consistent discount rate
  • Include all cash flows between parties
  • Use gross premiums (no expense netting)
4 Reasonably Possible Scenario Requirement A scenario is considered valid only if:
  • The entire set of assumptions can reasonably occur together

(Prevents cherry-picking assumptions.)

5 "Substantially All" Exception Risk transfer may still exist if significant loss is not possible, provided:
  • Reinsurer assumes substantially all risk
  • Cedant retains no more than trivial risk
  • Reinsurer's economics ≈ direct writer
6 Deposit Accounting Trigger If no indemnification of insurance risk exists:
  • Ceded premium treated as a deposit
  • No reserve credit / no reinsurance accounting
7 Prospective vs. Retroactive Reinsurance Conceptual distinctions:
  • Prospective reinsures future events
  • Retroactive reinsures past events
  • Some treaties contain both types

(Useful context, lightly tested.)

Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.