I see the commentary that TRIA wasn't an accepted answer as they considered it "intervention" would you not consider atleast one of these to be 'regulating' insurance?

I would have assumed that an N/A response for #6 would be due to a qualified opinion or no opinion.

Could someone please explain why the JUA would have lower volatility than the RF if in both cases the insurer shares in profits/losses/expenses in proportion to their voluntary business market share.

However, in reading the examiners report for 2017 Spring #6b, it sounds like the "servicing carrier" is the insurer (previously I thought the servicing carrier was the JUA, but the examiner