I'm missing, but I'm slightly less sure about #2, I feel like it's a solid answer here but would anyone be able to confirm with reasonable confidence that this would be an acceptable answer?

Based on Spring 2019 #22 part b, I am interpreting this correcting that this should be % of point estimate reserves, rather than % of carried reserves?

However, Full Battle Quiz #20, rating considerations that Task Force believes to be unfairly discriminatory, one of the answers is "propensity to shop for insurance."

* In scenario #2, (CY incremental paid loss is $30), cumulative paid increase by $30 but reserve decreases only by $4. meaning that Actuary at end of CY believe that the estimated reserve from 1 year

Hello, BattleActs TA

part a) - once I calculated (loss net of RE premium)/RE premium > 1.1, why still need to compare with probability of loss? 15% in #1, 2% in #2, 1% in #3

Below are my queries regarding this question. Appreciate someone could help to explain.

* https://battleacts6us.ca/wiki6us/Exam_Summaries#2019_Fall

Is this problem's method for calculating the Reinsurance RBC still applicable?

For Question #22a, I thought using the actuary's point estimate (or anything the actuary calculated) to calculate a materiality standard was not allowed. Am I confused about this? I thought the materi

I interpreted the table as there is a:

for a. i. why can't I say other actuary's qualification but can ****Disclose the affiliation of the other actuary****?

* https://battleacts6us.ca/wiki6us/Odomirok.14-F#2018.Spring_.239_.28essay.29

How do we get the 3rd materiality standard and what does company action level mean ?

Hi for c is "relevant comment - reinsurance collectability" a legit answer? I am not seeing it either your or CAS' solution. Thank you for the help.

Hi for part a), In Opinion C, I thought key word "inadequate" should be used, instead of "are less than the min amt...", but solution didn't mention it at all. Do I have a point? …

Hi for b) is solution's format must be followed? For instance, compulsory and high voter interest only count as one solution? Thank you

Hi for c) can bright-line test be used here? If not, what are the possible reasons? Thank you.

Hi Graham, in F14#23a, per the solution, is excluding the UEPR for Long Duration Contracts a correct option for this problem too? Thank you

like we did in Fall 2012 #2 for Total Profit