study false information. (Rank 4 IRIS- problem #22)

In this problem, despite payments being made at mid-year the durations in the sample answer are 1, 2 and 3. Yet, for 2015.Fall #19 a similar comment is made of payments being made mid-year and the d…

The examiner's report stated that the list below are variations of the unique response: Buyers are sophisticated

* https://battleacts6us.ca/wiki6us/Exam_Summaries#2019_Fall

For part B,

One of the flashcards under NAIC.SSAP-62R mentioned that under prospective reinsurance accounting, loss reserves increase when there is a claim but this problem's answer mentions loss reserves decrea…

The excel version of the titled exam/question has an error - the gross insured loss amount for Option1/Hurricane should be 100M

For part a ii):

Maybe an indicator should be put on this BattleCard to indicate that the solution in the examiner's report is no longer valid because of the dividend portion of the calculation and AMIT/AMTI. Also, m…

Maybe an indicator should be put on this BattleCard to indicate that the solution in the examiner's report is no longer valid because of the dividend portion of the calculation and AMIT/AMTI. Also, m…

Accounting basis for reserves is currently listed as a BattleCard answer for part b even though part b is asking for disclosures other than the stated basis of the reserves. This was accepted as an a…

can I use regular method [(Loss - premium)/premium] >10%

The infinite problem generator in BQ2 does not subtract reinsurer premiums when computing the U/W loss, but #25a in BQ3 DOES net out the premiums when computing the loss. Which is the correct approach

Contract #2:

Can someone provide commentary on why both UEPR included and excluded were accepted answers to part a.? Reviewing COPLFR, it seems that UEPR could be included if UEPR is one of the reserve items incl…

Just wanted to call out, in the ER for part a it reads, "Common errors included listing an unacceptable type of opinion like adequate opinion, unqualified, opinion, none, or over-reserved."

The answer provided in the exam report to part a.i. refers to the carried reserves being within the appointed actuary's range of unpaid claim estimates.

I have a similar question for Spring 2019 #22. Is the reason they used 10% of the point estimate rather than 10% of the carried reserves for the materiality standard because the question said "in

Parts (b) and (c) are grouped together in the Prior Exams Section, and it says that the examiners report solution is outdated. It's a little unclear to me whether both parts are outdated or just part…

I feel this goes against Spring 2016 #26, however. The examiner's report selects the first loss that is greater than a 10% chance of a loss, corresponding to 20,000. I would argue that, based on the w