for Part a)

"Insurer #1 has increased ultimate claims along each diagonal but it hasn't earned more business."

I wrote one reason as " Insurer #1 has increased ultimate claims along each diagonal but it hasn't earned more business. This could imply insurer #1 might write more high risk business. However,

Is there information in a wiki that classifies the NAIC bond classes as investment grade and below investment grade? I understand how different bonds/stocks are valued under SAP but not how to catego…

I'm a bit confused on how "ceded" is defined here. I understand in part a ii. that the ceded is zero, as there is no outside reinsurance, and within the Schedule P intercompany pooling woul…

From the examiner's report, one of the solutions for part a uses the claims closure rate. Can you explain why a decrease of the claims closure rate at the 12 and 24 month evaluations leads us to conc…

of this? For example I noticed in Spring 2018 #15 accepted answers were

I think BattleCard #16 in Mini BattleQuiz 2 would be better off in Mini BattleQuiz 6. This question requires knowledge of the components of FV(liabilities) and wouldn't be answerable with just the kno

Hello,

can I use regular method [(Loss - premium)/premium] >10%

Hello,

The problem asks us to describe three concerns the regulator might have based on the assets shown. I understand the Sample answers etc... but I've seen no example like this in the source text or BA w…

Looking for some clarification on terminology for part a of this question. In the exhibit for commission and brokerage, when the line is "reinsurance ceded" (2.3 and 2.6), is this the cedin…

I calculated IRIS 2 but I don't understand the adjustment made. I do understand the need for the adjustment, just not the methodology. Can you explain generally how we go about making these adjustmen…

The wiki says that the RP calculation for unauthorized reinsurers is no longer capped by C. But in BA practice exam 1, #13, it looks like the unauthorized calculation does include caps of C. Just look

In the Statutory Income (2018.Spring #10a) section, the red footnote 2 in the wiki says: "Investment revenue excludes realized capital gains AND excludes unrealized capital gains". In the in

If I understand correctly, for Fall 2015 #15 a, CUCG works, I don't need to use 35% for DTA?

Not sure if this is where I should post about typos (let me know if there is a better place to do so). In the Statutory Income (Spring.2018 #10a) section, the green "[16]" should be "[2

Contract #1:

Can someone elaborate on the below answer that was part of the examiner's report that was accepted for part a? I am not sure I understand what it means.