2017 Fall Q27b

Looking at the solution guide for restating triangles after commutation - the final step of calculating the net ultimate loss after commutation seems overcomplicated. Is there a benefit to thinking of the solution using the sum of the net and ceded reserves without commutation? I was thinking of just using the Gross reserves without commutation.

Because we know that the ceded reserves will go to 0 after the commutation, we know that the net reserves after the commutation will equal the gross reserves before the commutation.
Then we can just use the gross reserves formula given [net resv / (1 - qs%)] rather than having to derive the ceded reserve formula and sum the net and ceded reserves.

Anyways - it was more helpful for me to think of the Net Ultimate Losses with Commutation as Net Paid Loss with Commutation (part i) plus Net Reserves with Commutation.
Then substituting using the fact that Net Reserves with Commutation = Gross Reserves Before Commutation (because Ceded Reserves with Commutation are 0), I just need to solve for the Gross Reserves since we know the Net.

Net Ultimate Loss w/Commutation = Net Paid Loss w/Commutation + Gross Reserves before Commutation

Just want to make sure this is equivalent to what is shown in the solution!

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.